The survey says

A national survey of Software Development managers showed an overwhelming number believe Linux is more secure than Windows.

Asked to rate the security of server operating environments against operating system related hacks and exploits, Windows Server fared worst by far. Some 58% rated Windows Server very insecure or insecure versus 13% for Linux. Sun Solaris fared best, with only 6% rating the operating system very insecure or insecure. On the positive side, some 74% of respondents rated Linux secure or very secure versus only 38% for Windows Server.

Ballmer must be scrambling to pay for yet another FUD survey disproving the results, or at least throwing a few chairs around.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Vista Cartoon

Great Vista Cartoon courtesy of The Joy of Tech.

I love the punchline.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Building Bridges, Spreading FUD

And now from the “gag me” department. Via Groklaw.

Dan Bricklin is hosting a meeting on Monday from 9AM to noon sponsored by the Massachusetts Technology Leadership Council on the Novell-Microsoft deal.

Our expert panel will discuss this agreement and related issues with heavy audience participation, as is the tradition of our Open Source group.

I can guarantee the ONE question that every Linux/Open Source advocate is dying to ask and that WON’T be answered is:

“What Microsoft IP does Linux infringe on?” Specifically.

Any takers?

Update: Looks like a bunch of people submitted questions and the meeting has now been postponed.

After a review of the areas that would be covered by questions provided in advance by attendees, it became clear that there needed to be other speakers better able to address those issues.

I wonder who the “Other Speakers” are. Lawyers, Maybe?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Cisco’s iPhone Trademark

Ed Burnette has an interesting blog piece about CISCO abandoning the iPhone trademeark by not using it. And there are other reports that CISCO may lose the trademark in Europe due to a technicality in the complicated trademark laws.

It will be interesting to see how all of this pans out, but CISCO may not be on firm ground on this issue as I first thought they were.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

iSued ’cause iPhoned

Mark Chandler, CISCO’s SVP and General Counsel presents a lucid, rational explanation for the CISCO Lawsuit.

…this is not a suit against Apple’s innovation, their modern design, or their cool phone. It is not a suit about money or royalties. This is a suit about trademark infringement.

Moreover, in their filing, CISCO presents evidence of how Apple tried to surreptitiously obtain the rights to use the name through a shell company – Ocean Telecom Services LLC in Trinidad and Tobago of all places! They also filed an application in Australia for the trademark. I know a lot of companies have shell corporations for this kind of stuff, but to do it after CISCO wouldn’t give up the trademark was a lowly act by an otherwise classy company.

Give it up Apple. CISCO is the rightful owner of the trademark no matter how much you want to whine about it now. They sell very similar products under the same moniker and have done so for a while. Apple’s spokesman termed the lawsuit “silly” because Apple is the first one to call a “Cellphone” an iPhone. Give me a break – if I were the judge that listened to that explanation I would come down on Apple like a ton of bricks. I love this company but sometimes Steve Jobs’ ego gets in the way of rational thought. How would Apple (legal) react if CISCO came out with a new network router tomorrow and called it the iPod?

I am not naive to think that CISCO is pure as the driven snow in this affair. The fact that they said this is NOT about money is very telling. They talk about interoperability and openness. Translation – Apple has a kewl product(s) and they want IN. Other than the Geeks CISCO is not a household named among teenagers, and teenagers buy iPods not networking equipment. But they own something Apple wants – the iPhone name and they got it first, fair and square. So Apple need to either make a deal with CISCO (which seems unlikely at this point), or call the darn thing an ApplePhone or MacPhone or whatever else. And for good measure, send a few free ones to CISCO with an iTunes gift card.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

iPhone

All I can say is WOW!

I am sure the usual naysayers(read Apple Haters) will emerge with their “what’s so great about this? …too expensive… My cell phone has more memory/functions/…. how Windows Mobile is incrementally better at this or that.”

Doesn’t matter. Apple has proven to be the only company that makes me WANT a product even if I don’t need it. As Steve Jobs said in his Keynote yesterday.

“You had me at scroll!”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Taking the Patent fight to Microsoft

Dana Gardner has a great take on how organizations can respond to the patent FUD threats by Microsoft. He is absolutely right. The best way to counter Microsoft is to use your purchasing clout.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

It’s Christmas!

Here’s Wishing one and all:

Merry Christmas & Happy Holidays !

Peace on Earth – Goodwill to men.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

WGA locks out a beta tester

Ever wonder why I keep calling Microsoft evil? Here’s a classic example. Warning: The blog has some salty language since the man is obviously upset.

Rob was a beta tester for Microsoft and was an ardent supporter. WGA killed his Vista activation. When he griped about it they called him a thief and deleted his comments from the boards. Then they completely cut him off from all the boards. His passport account has been blocked. Classic Microsoft.

Here’s a quote from his blog:

I’m really frustrated by this, and I can’t believe MS is doing it. But this isn’t a life quest for me – at least not until after the Cowboys game is over. Am I disappointed, disgusted, frustrated and even appalled? Yes I am. MS has really done more then let me down today. They’ve embarrassed me for supporting them. They’ve lost some trust I don’t think they can ever regain. They have been evil. They have censored me. They have cut my voice off – ignored my opinions, and basically disposed of me. I won’t forget that anytime soon. Mostly I am sorry for the time and energy I have spend over the last year supporting Vista. I am heart-broken that I spent that time fruitlessly for a company that obviously doesn’t care, doesn’t get it, and could care less if I was a happy customer. I am dismayed that they cut me off without consultation. I am freaked out that they delete my posts. Best one word description for my experience with MS today: disgust.

Look for this to be repeated over and over again when Vista gets to the masses. When WGA decides you are a THIEF, you will be locked out of your machine and you will have no recourse. Another great scam brought to you by the disgusting despicable morally and ethically bankrupt monopoly.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

The Begining of the End

After years of enduring Microsoft sponsored FUD, the Linux community and IBM have finally got the first glimpse of vindication when U.S. District Judge Dale Kimball upheld federal Magistrate Brooke Wells’ June decision to strike down two-thirds of SCO’s allegations.

Here is Judge Kimball’s ruling. The original ruling by Judge Brooke Wells can be found here.

I know no one wants to read lengthy legal documents so here’s the meat of the matter.

Having thoroughly reviewed and considered the briefing related to IBM’s Motion to Limit SCO’s Claims, the briefing related to SCO’s objections, the underlying previous discovery orders, and the arguments made at the October 24 hearing, the court finds that, even under a de novo standard of review, the Magistrate Judge’s June 28, 2006 Order is correct. The court finds that SCO failed to comply with the court’s previous discovery-related Orders and Rule 26(e), that SCO acted willfully, that SCO’s conduct has resulted in prejudice to IBM, and that this result–the inability of SCO to use the evidence at issue to prove its claims– should come as no surprise to SCO. In addition, the court finds that neither particularized findings on an item-by- item basis nor an evidentiary hearing is required to make these determinations. The court, therefore, affirms and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s June 28, 2006 Order in its entirety.

Hey Darl, maybe you need to call up your buddy Mike Anderer and get Steve Ballmer to buy some more Unix licences. Now that SCO’s stock is dropping like a rock and all its investors are essentially abandoning it. Ruthless world ain’t it bud? That’s what you get for LYING.

I especially liked the fact that SCO’s #1 Fan and media champion – Rob Enderle was quoted in the Salt Lake Tribune as saying “We’re waiting for the proverbial fat lady to sing”. Analysts change their tune quickly don’t they? More like rats deserting a sinking ship.

There is another important lesson in this. If you do Microsoft’s dirty work for them, don’t expect them to come to you rescue when crap hits the fan.

I feel sorry for the hard working shlubs at SCO. They have families to feed and mortgages to pay. The logical end to this is a bankrupt company that was once famous for writing really good UNIX software. The grunts will soon be looking for a job while Darl McBride floats off on his golden parachute to a much deserved vacation in the Bahamas. Such is life.

I wonder now if SCO as a company will last till the trial set for mid next year. And the Novell trial is first.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment